When you say someone is lieing you must PROVE IT.
Frankly, I don't believe you on anything you've said. I asked you about your felony convictions and you tried to change the subject. Evasion is one of the things I was trained to watch for.
Yes, and I gave you the data source as well:
http://www.opm.gov/feddata/HistoricalTables/ExecutiveBranchSince1940.asp
From the same agency as your data source. Mine is the more detailed table. In accounts for changes in DoD vs. civilian agency staffing. Yours just mixes them together so that any ‘peace dividend’ from the end of the Cold War becomes invisible. Any staffing decrease from having a much smaller military was far overtaken by padded staffing in civilian agencies. I have shown this repeatedly. You choose not to recognize this fact and in stead play rhetorical games or cast aspersions on me.
Again, you are trying to attack the arguer rather than the argument. That’s utterly pathetic. I’m not here to play bigger wee wee games about background and qualifications. I’m debating facts and arguments. Since you are losing in those areas, you appear to have acted in desperation to change the topic. I am not going to stoop to your level and start attacking your background or making assertions about you. I don’t need to.
You were proved wrong. Then you made an ad hominem inquiry. Then you retreated into self-referential weirdness.
You change your ground every minute and insist all replies conform to some bizarre, low insight set of rules the rest of us have to guess at.
Personally I am having NO trouble believing that you work for the public sector:- probably doing some job which could be replaced by an Excel macro.