Look, I stated I’ve had a security clearance. Hence I’ve not had a felony conviction. You just don’t grasp that questioning the debater instead of his point just shows the weakness of your argument. You’re simply out of ammo. Your arguments are either simply factually wrong (the numbers) or based on laughable premises (nobody incompetent is ever hired by the federal government because they are over 25).
I understand you are trying to save face by going after me since you can’t beat my facts and arguments, but honestly, it’s just another pathetic ploy.
When you say someone is lieing you must PROVE IT.
Frankly, I don't believe you on anything you've said. I asked you about your felony convictions and you tried to change the subject. Evasion is one of the things I was trained to watch for.