Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kcvl
I'm pretty sure they've turned the logic completely upsidedown:

Rich people have money and spend money. They consume valuable resources. Rich people with lots of kids are raping the planet and must be stopped.

Poor people have no money and consume few resources. Therefore, poor people do little harm to the planet and should be encouraged to reproduce in hopes that more and more people will consume fewer and fewer resources.

We must save the erf!

13 posted on 07/20/2011 10:13:24 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
Modern Socialist - Simon Ross

Simon Ross - trustee of The Optimum Population Trust

"I felt that population growth was a key factor underlying many of today’s big issues, from loss of amenity, pollution and congestion to biodiversity decline, resource scarcity and climate change."

Simon Ross on February 25th, 2011 5:34 pm:

"Biodiversity loss, climate change and resource depletion are caused by people. To reject efforts to reduce human numbers and hence their impact on the basis that this is a “distraction” from lifestyle change, green technology, economic development, social change or all of the above is simply a strategy for ineffectiveness and immiseration. We should be using all the tools in the box to address human impact, not squabbling over which is the best one."

"The measures generally accepted as contributing to a lower birth rate are access to affordable reproductive healthcare, women’s empowerment, economic opportunity and education on family planning and the benefits to society of smaller families. These have been proven to work. They don’t reduce the population instantly, but that isn’t a good reason to reject them as a contribution to reducing human impact on resources and the environment. Ben and Ian are explicit in preferring the focus to be on “changes..that work” and “challenging society”, arguments used by past generations of socialists for rejecting anti-imperialism, feminism and environmentalism as distractions from the class struggle, a stance that modern socialists reject."

35 posted on 07/20/2011 10:56:37 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson