>>Your comment about ‘cult of personality’ is an insult to supporters of Governor Palin. If you knew any better, you’d be ashamed of yourself.<<
Then your skin is thinner than I could possibly have imagined. I’ll keep that in mind in the future. How do you get up in the morning? “Good Morning” must send you into fits!
>>You’re lying about using arithmetic.<<
Which part? (Don’t bother, my arithemetic was correct)
>>You’re lying about being ‘attacked’. You’re lying about the reason anyone might have to ‘attack’<<
You have attacked me. You even attacked me ON ANTOTHER THREAD (and I was kind not to note the breach of rules and etiquette)
>>and you’re woefully misinformed about limited release movies. <<
No, you are. Your ignorance doesn’t make a truth. It may get you off the hook for overtly lying (just barely), but it doesn’t make me wrong nor you right. (well, it makes me right but that is another discussion).
>>That’s just for starters.<<
So far all you have is you were hurt because I described the film as a “Cult of Personality” film. I didn’t call YOU a name, didn’t call Gov. Palin a name, didn’t call ANYONE a name. There have been no insults nor untruths.
You: A lie is anything I disagree with.
Me: A lie is an untruth knowingly stated.
In other words you are bending the truth — beyond reality — because you were caught.
Other than that all you have is you disagree with me and are ignorant on some things.
I can send you a Band-Aid (TM) for your boo-boo if that helps. Because clearly you are easily offended and hurt by facts, analyses and conclusions that you disagree with.
I leave you to your chamber of mirrors and echos.
I didn’t attack you at all. I merely noted that some slimeball on FR had told us that all this was meaningless. Apparently, you felt guilty enough to respond. Talk about thin skin...
If I’m wrong, prove it.
Either produce a link backing up your assertion that ‘limited release’ means more than 10 screens or apologize to everyone for wasting their time.