[faucetman]

Sorry, Fred. Get over it. You are WRONG. The jury has spoken LOUDLY. 10-2 in the first 5 minutes and one more day to acquit her of all serious charges. Because they were stupid? No, because there was no EVIDENCE.

Nothing to tie Casey to anything.

1. No cause of death
2. No location of death
3. No believable motive
4. No believable physical evidence
5. No murder weapon
6. Dubious murder finding by medical examiner with no cause of death
7. PHONY prosecution testing

This case was a NO BRAINER! And I mean the prosecutors had no brains. They had NO CASE. Even after keeping her in jail for 3 years trying to “fabricate” a case, they failed.

I have actual “PROOF” of my position. A jury verdict of NOT guilty. Hardly “innocent”, but definitely not guilty.

[beandog]

I think you’re the one with no brain, just like the jury. Her little girl is dead and she killed her. I hope the rest of her life is as miserable as she made her little girl’s life.

[FredZarguna]

Apparently you're unfamiliar with circumstantial evidence, the burden of proof, or even logical reasoning or common sense.

Good for you! You are an excellent reason why we need this kind of law.

As to your pathetic "argument."

1. No cause of death
2. No location of death
3. No believable motive
4. No believable physical evidence
5. No murder weapon
6. Dubious murder finding by medical examiner with no cause of death
7. PHONY prosecution testing

You perhaps lack the capacity to understand this, but for the benefit of those who have it, None of 1,2,4 or 5 is part of the burden of proof in a murder case. If you're literate go read some case studies. You will find that in circumstantial cases people are found guilty of murder all the time with none of these, and in many cases when there is no body whatsoever.

No believable motive? Egad! You should be a jury foreman! The month long Bacchanalia of this terribly concerned woman establishes that she was the very epitome of responsible motherhood, tirelessly sacrificing herself in the search for her child: I predict she will continue to comb every bar, club, tavern, and disco in Florida in the search for the real killer. Maybe she can take up golf so that she and OJ can help each other out. The idea, that a toddler would put a crimp in the social life of such a responsible parent is a rabidly wild speculation unheard of in the history of law enforcement!

To your other silly "points," 6 is just a repetition of non-requirements already demolished, and 7 is an incomprehensible fragment of thought.

The JURY was a NO BRAINER! Thanks for establishing your qualifications to serve! [And, as an aside: I do hope you haven't reproduced yet, and aren't planning to.]

You have proof of nothing but that the system failed. It's a human institution. Sometimes that happens.