Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teg_76

Steve Hayes on Fox tonight said McConnell’s gambit was way too early and has frozen the talks.


2 posted on 07/14/2011 4:19:31 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AU72
Because Hayes doesn't get it. McConnell is offering an increase, IF THE PRESIDENT LAYS OUT THE SPENDING CUTS.

The initial legislation would authorize the President to submit a request to Congress asking to increase the debt limit by $700 billion, and would require submission of a plan to reduce spending by a greater amount.
Upon receipt of the President’s request, the debt limit would be provisionally increased by $100 billion to provide breathing room and avert an August 2nd default.
The House and Senate would have 15 days to disapprove of the request.
Within three days of the President’s request, it would be in order for the House and Senate to introduce a joint resolution disapproving of the President’s request.

Under expedited consideration of the Resolution of Disapproval, the resolution would be placed directly on the Senate calendar; the Motion to Proceed to the resolution would be privileged; there would be 10 hours of debate and passage would require a simple majority.
If either chamber defeats the resolution, the remaining $600 billion increase would be allowed.
If both chambers pass the resolution, it would be sent to the President for a veto or signature.
If vetoed, debate on an override would be limited to one hour.
If the veto is overridden (which would require a 2/3 vote) in both chambers, then the request would be denied and the provisional $100 billion increase revoked.
If the veto is sustained in either chamber, the remaining $600 billion increase would be allowed.
For the second and third requests in fall 2011 and summer 2012, the President could request an increase of the debt limit by $900 billion once the Treasury Department determines that the country is within $100 billion of the debt limit. The President would also be required to submit a plan to reduce spending by a greater amount.. Each of these subsequent requests would be subject to the same disapproval process outlined above.

For those of you that can't read it says....

Sure, you can have it. Put it in writing and OWN it.

6 posted on 07/14/2011 4:26:30 PM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AU72

We better Hunker down for a 5 year fight. This is going to get Bumpy. The RINOS may have just given Obama another term. Especially if they nominate Romney or Jeb Bush. Maybe we can try to get the House and take the leadership from the RINOS. But it is gonna be a long haul and we are stuck with Obamacare. UGGGHHHH!


9 posted on 07/14/2011 4:29:12 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (Socialism...Easier said than done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AU72
McConnel was paid off and has to go IMO.
People should investigate the sources of his income from the last ten years through the next ten. SMELLS!

Congress can still sink plan B IMO and they should do so.
What right does McConnel have to stop progress towards a balanced budget? Something is up with him. He needs recalling.

41 posted on 07/14/2011 5:47:15 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AU72

Steve doesn’t get it.


52 posted on 07/14/2011 6:13:43 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson