Herman and Pawlenty were at 2%..
To: NormsRevenge
I have a hunch Ron Paul will win and upset in IA but not the nomination.
2 posted on
07/14/2011 2:09:17 PM PDT by
RED SOUTH
(Follow me on twitter @redsouth72)
To: NormsRevenge
Polls are meaningless.
Ron Paul?
Ron Paul will NEVER be the Republican candidate for President nor is he likely to garner more than minimal votes in any Presidential primary
3 posted on
07/14/2011 2:09:37 PM PDT by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: NormsRevenge
Sarah's not running!!!
</sarcasm>
4 posted on
07/14/2011 2:09:55 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
To: NormsRevenge
Cain seems to have petered out pretty quickly in Iowa for some reason. I guess Bachmann and now Palin are sucking all the air out of the competition right now. Cain really hurt himself seeming ill-prepared to discuss foreign and military issues. It communicated he wasn’t quite ready. I lean toward Cain unless/until Perry and/or Palin get in. Not thrilled to see him drop, though. I’d like to see him among the top 3 or 4 at least.
7 posted on
07/14/2011 2:13:29 PM PDT by
ilgipper
( political rhetoric is no substitute for competence (Thomas Sowell))
To: NormsRevenge
Now, if Paul could have figured out how to translate winning meaningless polls into winning actual votes, he would have already been president.
"We're number 3!" "We're number 3!"/deranged Paulista
To: NormsRevenge
As a Palin supporter I'm thrilled to see her poll numbers rise quickly in Iowa. However, at this early date, I just can't take poll numbers, even those that make my preferred candidate look good, too seriously. Still, as the L.A. Times story states, it is impressive. The 'she's not running' crowd can bray that meme all they want but until such time as Sarah Palin actually says that she isn't running, she'll have my support in whatever way I can offer it. Meanwhile, I'll continue to hope that Sarah Palin will run.
13 posted on
07/14/2011 2:24:33 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
( Sarah Palin for president in 2012!)
To: NormsRevenge
I can't wait until we don't have to hear anymore about that crazy uncle from Lake Jackson, Texas, Ron Paul.
Ron Paul spam-bots will be full throttle trying to punk the polls.
16 posted on
07/14/2011 3:12:35 PM PDT by
lormand
(A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
To: NormsRevenge
19 posted on
07/14/2011 4:01:12 PM PDT by
familyop
(Rome was burned in a day--twice.)
To: NormsRevenge
21 + 14 + 11 = 46%. Bachmann and Paul (and Cain) need to drop out and endorse Sarah. It’s the only way conservatives will win the nomination.
24 posted on
07/16/2011 1:20:21 PM PDT by
Sarabaracuda
(I, Sarabaracuda, do hereby swear to support the Republican nominee for president.)
To: NormsRevenge
|
July 14, 2011 2012 New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary
| New Hampshire |
Likely Republican
Primary Voters |
Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
| Bachmann |
12% |
| Cain |
4% |
| Gingrich |
7% |
| Giuliani |
9% |
| Huntsman |
- |
| Johnson |
* |
| Palin |
8% |
| Paul |
4% |
| Pawlenty |
5% |
| Perry |
2% |
| Roemer |
- |
| Romney |
29% |
| Santorum |
2% |
| Other |
2% |
| Undecided |
16% |
July 12, 2011 2012 Iowa Republican Caucus
| Iowa |
Likely Republican
Caucus Goers |
Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
| Bachmann |
21% |
| Cain |
2% |
| Gingrich |
8% |
| Giuliani |
2% |
| Huntsman |
3% |
| Johnson |
- |
| Palin |
11% |
| Paul |
14% |
| Pawlenty |
2% |
| Perry |
2% |
| Roemer |
- |
| Romney |
18% |
| Santorum |
5% |
| Other |
2% |
| Undecided |
10% |
|
26 posted on
07/16/2011 1:39:33 PM PDT by
deport
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson