Is he right?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
2 posted on
07/13/2011 11:20:36 AM PDT by
ne1410s
(Psalm 109:8 May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Malcolm totally forgets the TpCaucus.. if he even knows what it is..
so soon many forget Nov. 2010... if they ever knew about it..
Nov. 2010 was the rehearsal for the main event in Nov. 2012..
The 900 lb Gorilla has gotten to be at least 1500 lbs.. and is not fully grown YET!...
3 posted on
07/13/2011 11:22:02 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Palin doesn’t run in 2012, she won’t win in 2012.
4 posted on
07/13/2011 11:22:15 AM PDT by
truthfreedom
(type your name)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The national media's gaffe detector is on full power for Bachmann and Palin And seems to only function for Republican candidates.
5 posted on
07/13/2011 11:22:22 AM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is he right?
Maybe in his own mind but the election is a long way away and much can happen by then. I plan to vote for Sarah for President.
6 posted on
07/13/2011 11:22:56 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(AMERICA LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
LA Times is the source.
I read no further.
7 posted on
07/13/2011 11:24:18 AM PDT by
Palladin
(Sarah Palin in 2012!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It’s still way too early for POTUS silly season. Methinks the visible candidates won’t be the nominee: they’re taking themselves too seriously too early, will burn out early, and will be eclipsed by someone who’s waiting and watching. She stirred the pot just to make it clear she’s around and interested, tweaked her enemies (the Leftist media) a bit, then went home to do other needs-doing things and lay low until time comes. Insofar as she quit office early, her enemies (prior noted) drove her out; she had finished what she set out to, and had to focus on being good instead of being adequate.
9 posted on
07/13/2011 11:25:33 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“And that admiring film got panned by some people you never heard of.”
Why would I care if it got panned by some people I never heard of?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So far it seems most of the people replying to this thread are taking the author of the article to be saying something quite different from what I think he is saying.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is he right?The LA Times is ALWAYS right, ALWAYS! ; )
13 posted on
07/13/2011 11:26:54 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is he right?The LA Times is ALWAYS right, ALWAYS! ; )
14 posted on
07/13/2011 11:26:55 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Reading the whole blog, even he admits he’s not right.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Obama can win, anyone can win.
18 posted on
07/13/2011 11:28:50 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does it matter? Who’s is stupid enough to take the ‘flaming’ you would get for agree with him. It could be November 5th 2012 and you would still get flamed for suggesting that Sarah isn’t running.
20 posted on
07/13/2011 11:30:51 AM PDT by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s part of the lying liberal media, so most assuredly that whatever he is saying is the complete opposite of reality.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This election has yet to really begin so it is silly to count anyone out yet.
22 posted on
07/13/2011 11:32:15 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
He’s being SARCASTIC. His point is that Palin is a VERY viable Republican candidate if she gets in, not the opposite. He’s saying that anybody who bets against our Sarah is a FOOL.
Sheesh.
24 posted on
07/13/2011 11:33:48 AM PDT by
Argus
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“You can forget about Sarah Palin as a Republican candidate, if you want to look silly by fall”
OK. Bear with me, but isn’t that the same thing as saying “If you want to look silly, forget about Sarah” - ?
28 posted on
07/13/2011 11:35:30 AM PDT by
freedomlover
(Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
29 posted on
07/13/2011 11:36:08 AM PDT by
paddles
("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is he right?
No
And, unlike Zero, she won’t need a billion dollars to win the election.
31 posted on
07/13/2011 11:36:52 AM PDT by
GlockLady
(Remember when we were taught HOW to think, not WHAT to think? (Author Unknown))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson