Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s Jet Engine Future
China Sign Post ^ | July 13, 2011 | Gabe Collins & Andrew Erickson

Posted on 07/13/2011 5:10:05 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

China’s Jet Engine Future

July 13, 2011

By Gabe Collins & Andrew Erickson

Rapid improvements in China's military jet engine capabilities have major implications for the global defence industry.

Following is a guest entry from Gabe Collins and Andrew Erickson, co-founders of China Sign Post.

China's military jet engine capability is increasing at a rapid pace, with implications not only for China's independent military capabilities, but also for the global defence industry. Yet China also faces major impediments in achieving its strategic aim of establishing itself as an independent manufacturer in one of aerospace's most complex engineering technologies: high-performance turbofan engines. Our recent paper, Jet Engine Development in China found that China's progress is uneven but that the resources being devoted to the task will likely result in significant strides that will have profound strategic implications.

Strategic Implications

China's lack of a domestic, mass-produced high-performance jet engine for combat aircraft is an enduring weakness for the Chinese military and has slowed the development and production of new, more modern aircraft. To address this, the Chinese Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC) is to invest 10 billion RMB ($1.5 billion) into jet engine R&D over the next 5 years.

The Chinese aerospace industry is pursuing the ability to manufacture large volumes of high-performance tactical aircraft engines with four strategic imperatives in mind:

Avoiding parts dependence: As China develops more of its own tactical aircraft, it will not want supplies of parts to be determined by non-Chinese suppliers, primarily Russian.

Secure supplies: China cannot be certain that its demand can be met by Russian suppliers over the

(Excerpt) Read more at the-diplomat.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; engine; pla

1 posted on 07/13/2011 5:10:09 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In other news, Boeing dropped their bid to build a plant in South Carolina and instead decided to move its entire operations to China. (soon to be followed by Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics).


2 posted on 07/13/2011 5:21:11 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The news is not bad for America, but for Europe and especially for Russia it is terrible.

The competition for a really good military plane or family of planes will put Russia out of the business....... the only business they have worth a damn. It will not be good for the French or marginal Europeans hoping to sell their planes.


3 posted on 07/13/2011 5:26:52 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ....Flash mobs are trickle down leftwing REDISTRIBUTION))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Boeing is not in the engine manufacturing business. GE and PW make most of the engines. For some unknown reason they are still made here in the US for now.


4 posted on 07/13/2011 5:57:43 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Boeing is not in the engine manufacturing business. GE and PW make most of the engines. For some unknown reason they are still made here in the US for now.”

LOL. You mean final assembly in the US. I very much doubt we have any clue as to where the components or raw materials come from - but I can guess one country that plays a HUGE role in our military programs (and I don’t mean the USA).


5 posted on 07/13/2011 6:44:39 AM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson