To: opentalk; butterdezillion; rxsid; Red Steel; Danae; Fred Nerks; Kenny Bunk; Brown Deer; ...
The guy is right. THat crappy looking "4" has a curved lower half and used to be a "3"
71 posted on
07/13/2011 12:39:08 AM PDT by
Future Useless Eater
(Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
To: Future Useless Eater; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Plummz; Fantasywriter; ColdOne; ...
The guy is right. That crappy looking "4" has a curved lower half and used to be a "3"
. . . . Check out # 71. Thanks, Future Useless Eater.
72 posted on
07/13/2011 1:03:31 AM PDT by
LucyT
To: Future Useless Eater
The guy is right. THat crappy looking "4" has a curved lower half and used to be a "3"
*******
I find this bizarre:
Hawaii registrar Onaka won't allow the public to examine Obama's ORIGINAL long form birth certificate, citing Hawaii privacy laws, even though President Obama has supposedly already released a copy of his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011.
My point is this: Didn't President Obama give up his right to claim protection from privacy laws that apply to his long form birth certificate when he released a copy of his long form on April 27, 2011?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson