“If it had no traction, it wouldn’t be news and people wouldn’t be talking about it.”
By that logic, the fact that people are still questioning the moon landing after 40 years means that there must really be traction to their arguments.
And anyone who thinks moon landing conspiracy theorists are stupid but that WND’s experts should be taken seriously ought to go look at some moon hoax websites. You’ll find lots of experts arguing that anomalies in the images prove that the pictures are faked, and that the government is covering up the fakery. Sound familiar?
faked .pdf = faked moon landing?
Put down the pipe. You've had enough.
I can't for the life of me explain how the check boxes could end up with identical pixel configuration. To me, it's impossible unless they were copied and pasted.
Can anyone explain this, how these check boxes could be identical? The odds of this happening naturally must be 1 in 50 trillion.
If you look at the Nordyke check boxes, the same boxes from the same positions differ between the two separate “Twin” documents. When Paper and ink from the 1961 era are mated, you may get variables that provide distinctive differences with every printed copy. It's not happening with all the check boxes in the Obama Document. This seems impossible to me.
If someone could tell me how this could happen naturally, please do so. I would love to hear it.
by your logic, there would actually BE people calling the moon landing fake, whereas there are MILLIONS of people and software experts calling the BC fake, NO one is calling the moon landing fake who has any credentials, so, debate much online? or is your mother away from the computer?