I can't for the life of me explain how the check boxes could end up with identical pixel configuration. To me, it's impossible unless they were copied and pasted.
Can anyone explain this, how these check boxes could be identical? The odds of this happening naturally must be 1 in 50 trillion.
If you look at the Nordyke check boxes, the same boxes from the same positions differ between the two separate “Twin” documents. When Paper and ink from the 1961 era are mated, you may get variables that provide distinctive differences with every printed copy. It's not happening with all the check boxes in the Obama Document. This seems impossible to me.
If someone could tell me how this could happen naturally, please do so. I would love to hear it.
You will hear crickets.
There are two groups of people with whom I am especially upset: the conservative media and our highest military.
When did supporting, aiding, and ignoring fraud, forgery, possible usurpation of Commander in Chief, lying, and treachery become part of the military code of honor? Is this what they teach at West Point and the other military academies? Where is the evidence that our very highest military sought **peaceful** and legal certifiable clarification of Obama’s natural born citizenship from either congress or the courts? Honestly,...When our brave and honorable service men and women salute these highest ranking peacocks why aren't these admirals and generals struck with lightening?
The second group is the conservative media. I think it is unlikely that the whole bunch of them could conspire or be threatened into silence. Someone would be sure to break the wall of silence and reveal the conspiracy. Therefore...I conclude that the entire bunch of them are phony entertainers. Those who cry over the Constitution are actors crying crocodile tears. When true tyranny comes, they will sell their talents to the fascist oligarchy. They will spit shine the jack boots crushing our necks.
Our very highest military? The guys with the maximum amount of brass weighing them down? The yappers on talk radio and Fox? I trusted these guys! ( Silly me!)
“I can’t for the life of me explain how the check boxes could end up with identical pixel configuration. To me, it’s impossible unless they were copied and pasted. Can anyone explain this, how these check boxes could be identical?”
Easy: they’re not identical. There is not identical pixel configuration.
Do you think your 30 years of experience is enough to do some overlays and opacity adjustments to see for yourself? Have you even bothered to check this? Or do you need me to provide you a motion graphic showing that they’re different?
Coincidentally, the graphics expert cited in WND's last story on the subject -- thread here -- has a new article up today in which she writes:
Pixel-by-Pixel Twins: During the process of scanning, translation and optimization, the software searches for ways to create a document with the best possible appearance with the least required resources. One method of reducing effort is to duplicate similar characters from the first character identified, rather than re-forming each subsequent character from scratch. This results in a document, such as this one, with bits that are identical on a pixel-by-pixel basis.I don't know if this is true myself -- and someone else here has already demonstrated that they're not perfect pixel twins -- but I thought it was worth bringing up.