Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sunmars
This isn't good news at all. While there may be plenty of specific policies that one may agree or disagree with Paul about, he was one of the only unambiguously clear Constitutionalists in Washington, and is in no small part responsible for the increased resurgence of Constitutional conservatism and libertarianism - including among a notable younger audience - which is a remarkable achievement. Paul could be counted on to foster Constitutionally-consistent policies even when the specific outcome was unpopular. That kind of principle, and ideological consistency, is sorely lacking in a place too often governed by 'grand bargains,' and 'across the aisle' partnerships that always resort in an expansion of federal power. I didn't always agree with Paul, but I very much liked him being in D.C.; I for one will miss his voice.
20 posted on 07/12/2011 9:50:40 AM PDT by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: americanophile

I agree. It would have been good to have his voice in Congress when the new Republican President begins his term in 2013.


24 posted on 07/12/2011 9:54:46 AM PDT by ilgipper ( political rhetoric is no substitute for competence (Thomas Sowell))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: americanophile
This isn't good news at all.

The statist-GOP wing of FR doesn't care about all that. They'd rather focus on taking Dr. Paul's foreign policy statements out of context instead of focusing on the greater good he has done for the re-emergence of the conservative-libertarian movement.

26 posted on 07/12/2011 9:55:43 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: americanophile

Dr. Paul is best if we get a true conservative in the White House and he is made temporary “czar of shutting down superfluous government agencies” and “Ft. Knox / Federal Reserve inspector”.


33 posted on 07/12/2011 10:01:02 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: americanophile

Well said. Like you I could find a number of reasons to disagree with him but his fidelity to the Constitution and Liberty will definitely be missed.


74 posted on 07/12/2011 11:08:48 AM PDT by ImpBill ("America ... where are you now?" signed, a little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: americanophile

Paul could be counted on to foster Constitutionally-consistent policies even when the specific outcome was unpopular. That kind of principle, and ideological consistency, is sorely lacking in a place too often governed by ‘grand bargains,’ and ‘across the aisle’ partnerships that always resort in an expansion of federal power. I didn’t always agree with Paul, but I very much liked him being in D.C.; I for one will miss his voice.

I agree.

As I further from the pulican party, the more sense he makes. I am getting more and more small l libertarian.


107 posted on 07/13/2011 5:36:39 PM PDT by Chickensoup (The right to bear arms is proved to prevent totalitarian genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson