Replies

I invite you on any Palin thread to see how dirty it gets. As for SJB, he may not have jumped into the mud here, but he and I have several times before (like you and I have too) yet remained sane for the most part. :)

We passionate partisans are all guilty of mud jumping and thread pissing.

Yet, here, it gets nasty in email to the point of a physical threat. That’s happened to me twice, and those freepers are gone as physical threats are not tolerated. Of course, from what I’ve seen, posting private freepmails is against the rules too.

AM, can you clarify?

rintense to DoughtyOne; Admin Moderator

Rintense, I have been quite civil to you here and yet you felt perfectly justified to pull in the Admin Moderator. This confirms what I have addressed here better than I could have.

This is what you consider to be justified action if it involves Palin.

I invite you on any Palin thread to see how dirty it gets. As for SJB, he may not have jumped into the mud here, but he and I have several times before (like you and I have too) yet remained sane for the most part. :)

Okay, then why did you feel compelled to give him a hard time here? There was a problem between two people, and you chose one of them to back. Why?

We passionate partisans are all guilty of mud jumping and thread pissing.

Frankly I try not to be unfair. As for your other colorful euphemism here, I don't participate in that.

Yet, here, it gets nasty in email to the point of a physical threat. That’s happened to me twice, and those freepers are gone as physical threats are not tolerated. Of course, from what I’ve seen, posting private freepmails is against the rules too.

You do see three posts deleted, 49, 50, & 51 right? I don't know what precipitated the eMail. Perhaps you do.

Your comment was somewhat vague. Are you saying SJB threatened G in the eMail? Did posts 49, 50, & 51 cause him to respond in that manner?

AM, can you clarify?

I'm rather confused why you think you need to call the Admin Moderator in here. I asked you a simple question. All you had to do is reply.

I believe that you are fully aware of an exchange that took place here, which has been erased. I believe it should have been, but I do think it's rather one-sided to take one person to task and let the other person get off with barely a mention.

If you're trying to defend Palin people here, that isn't a very impressive way to do it.

Yes, you and I have had our 'discussions' before. We have been able to end them in as cordial a manner as possible, and move on. I think SJB deserves the same treatment here. He didn't pick somone out of the blue and go after them. He appears to me to have been goaded into it.