Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOBBLY BOB

Those graphs are bogus.

The “Exposed thorough hetero contact” numbers should be labeled: “Claimed by patient to be exposed...”

When diligent follow-up is done, men NEVER get it heterosexually, and the women all get it, um, the same way men get it from men.

Honestly, unprotected anal sex from dubious male partners is a terrible risk, and political correctness is silencing that life-saving advice.

Read Michael Fumento’s Myth of Heterosexual AIDS. He told the truth decades ago, and it all came true. He’s also an occasional Freeper, and his book on environmentalism turned me into a conservative.


33 posted on 07/10/2011 7:23:24 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba
...unprotected anal sex from dubious male partners is a terrible risk...

Is there really such a thing as "protected" anal sex? Read MassMike's link above for a pharmacist's intelligent take on homosexual perversion. A horrific 13% failure rate for latex condoms to protect against HIV transmission.

I liken "safe sex" to trying to make Russian Roulette "safer" for you by adding about 10 more cylinders to the revolver.

34 posted on 07/10/2011 7:31:23 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson