Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba
...unprotected anal sex from dubious male partners is a terrible risk...

Is there really such a thing as "protected" anal sex? Read MassMike's link above for a pharmacist's intelligent take on homosexual perversion. A horrific 13% failure rate for latex condoms to protect against HIV transmission.

I liken "safe sex" to trying to make Russian Roulette "safer" for you by adding about 10 more cylinders to the revolver.

34 posted on 07/10/2011 7:31:23 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

Is there really such a thing as “protected” anal sex?


Yes.

It’s like adding 999 cylinders to a Russian Roulette revolver.

It’s why the average gal whose regular sex partner (typically an IV drug abuser) take about two night of passion to become infected if they have anal sex, and about 500-1000 (before which he dies, so she lives) if they don’t.

See the “Padian Berkeley” study.

The “failure rate” of condoms” includes: “I forgot to use one”, and “It broke, but I thought, what the Heck.”

I have had a conversation with a homosexual man who told me point blank that the reason we should spend billions on AIDS research is to that homosexual men can have anal sex without a condom!

But to answer your question, a barrier is a barrier. Whether it keeps the fertile or fatal cells contained is the same.


35 posted on 07/10/2011 7:40:59 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson