Posted on 07/10/2011 12:32:51 PM PDT by Hojczyk
ExxonMobils earnings are from operations in more than 100 countries around the world. During the first quarter, more than three-quarters of our operating earnings came from outside of the United States.
The part of ExxonMobils business that refines and sells gasoline, diesel and other products in the United States represents less than 6 percent or 6 cents on the dollar of our earnings.
Why so little? Because we actually buy more crude oil to refine into gasoline and diesel in the U.S. than we produce ourselves. And these purchases are made on the open market at the prevailing rates.
During the first three months of this year, for every gallon of gasoline and other products we refined and sold in the United States, we earned about 7 cents. Compare that to the 40 to 60 cents per gallon that went from gasoline consumers to the government (state and federal) in gasoline taxes.
The underlying question people are asking is: Why are oil prices so high at the present time? The answer to this question is important because the price of crude oil accounts for most of the price of gasoline.
There are several factors involved in the rise in oil prices.
First, as a result of the global economy strengthening particularly in countries like China, India and Brazil demand for crude oil is on the rise.
Second, political instability in some oil-producing regions is contributing to uncertainty about future oil supplies. Oil markets are well-supplied today, but the issue is this: What will it cost to replace this supply if it is lost in the future? This uncertainty about tomorrow is reflected in prices today.
Finally, another factor behind higher oil prices is unique to the United States. And thats the weak U.S. dollar. Oil and most other food and industrial commodities are invoiced in dollars. Accordingly, when the dollar goes down the price of primary commodities tend to go up, and vice versa.
The dollar is at a three-year low against other currencies and is approaching the record low which occurred in 2008, when oil prices were at historically high levels.
The dollars decline accelerated last week after a warning by Standard & Poors about the countrys $14.3 trillion debt and economic weakness compared to other countries.
So these factors all combine to drive oil prices up.
What is our government doing about it? Unfortunately, theyre reaching for the political playbook rather than seeking real solutions.
We understand that its simply too irresistible for many politicians in times of high oil prices and high earnings they feel they have to demonize our industry.
Predictably last week the Administration established a task force to investigate oil and gas markets, now a time-honored tradition when prices increase.
And were seeing a return to the now-familiar misinformation about the oil industrys taxes.
Over the last week as earnings season has approached, the Democratic Party leadership again talked about removing what they call $4 billion in oil industry subsidies. But what they really mean is that they want to increase our taxes by taking away long-standing deductions for our industry while leaving these same deductions in place for other sectors of the economy. The simple truth is that these are legitimate tax provisions to keep U.S. industry internationally competitive to keep jobs from being exported to other countries.
Unfortunately, this false discussion about oil industry subsidies also reinforces another falsehood making the rounds: that ExxonMobil doesnt pay its fair share of income taxes in the United States.
Let me state it unequivocally. Last year, our total taxes and duties to the U.S. government were $9.8 billion, which includes an income tax expense of $1.6 billion. Over the past five years, we incurred a total U.S. tax expense of almost $59 billion, which is $18 billion more than we earned in the United States during the same period.
And during the first quarter of this year, we incurred tax expenses in the United States of more than $3.1 billion on U.S. earnings of $2.6 billion.
So we have seen the predictable political positioning but no action to actually help bring down energy prices. In fact the government has chosen not to help increase supply by refusing to open up the vast energy resources in this country that are off limits to our industry.
We have seen exploration and development in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico which accounts for 30 percent of all U.S. crude oil production effectively banned for the past year by the Obama Administration.
In addition, legislation was enacted targeted at restricting the supply of oil from Canada a country whose oil reserves are second only to Saudi Arabias.
Unfortunately, irresistible sound-bite politics rather than sound public policy is dominating the energy agenda in Washington but there is one reason for optimism about Americas economic and energy security.
That optimism lies in Americas extraordinary natural gas endowment. This resource is providing the United States with an enormous economic advantage as a result of American ingenuity and innovation.
Its nothing short of revolutionary that our industry has recently unlocked more than a 100 years worth of natural gas right here in the United States. And at some of the worlds lowest prices last month natural gas was selling for 40 percent less in the U.S. than in Europe.
Think of the advantages this is already providing in the form of power generation and fuel for manufacturing and other industries, not to mention the jobs and taxes natural gas production creates.
But there are concerns that political overreaction to a small number of isolated environmental issues could jeopardize this emerging industry and the benefits it provides.
Government policies did not cause the shale gas revolution in this country but they could stop it in its tracks.
Policymakers need to look carefully at the facts and avoid a bias against natural gas and fossil fuel development in favor of far more costly energy sources that are already receiving massive subsidies.
In fact, weve already spent more on alternative energy subsidies than we did on the Manhattan and Apollo projects combined. And what do we have to show for it? Unreliable and uneconomic energy sources that still cant compete even at todays prices.
On the other hand, natural gas is affordable, available and doesnt need taxpayer subsidies.
The technologies and industrial processes involved in developing shale gas are proven the industry has successfully fracked more than a million wells over the last 60 years. There are thousands of feet of rock between the natural gas deposit where the fracking takes place and the water table.
Risk to water supplies and air quality can be and are being mitigated by using proper well design, operating with care and following industry best practices and procedures that are all subject to regulation and government oversight.
When these technologies are applied properly and the industry remains focused on operational integrity, we can protect our environment and public health and enjoy this unprecedented economic advantage.
Energy policy should enable safe and environmentally responsible development of all of Americas natural resources, which will support economic recovery and improved quality of life.
Its time for our leaders to stop playing politics with the energy industry and to start working for solutions that will take the pressure off household budgets and enhance our energy security.
If this was actually written/authorized by exxonmobil, it was the most politically candid statement by a major oil co I have ever seen.
... and reasons 2 and 3 have been caused or at the least significantly affected by Obama.
Anybody wondering why the dolls is so down?
I can spell it out in one 5 letter word——OBAMA.
dolls=dollar, but you guessed that.
I watched the last oil company hearings before Congress and it was sickening. Schumer was doing his political grandstanding like he was a paid actor. It was obvious what the oil companies were saying but nobody was listening. So which do we need more - oil companies or Congress. I say if the oil companies shut down for a month, we’d be in a panic. If Congress shut down for a month, we’d be celebrating.
bttt
On the other hand, Bill O'Reilly is so stupid, he wouldn't understand what he's looking at.
.
Company executives blow out numbers. Too many people don't understand numbers; especially in Washington.
Graphs and charts are a much more effective communication medium.
.
Too bad the Stupid Party hasn't figured this out yet either.
Gee : What a great idea.
posted at link’s website:
...Gas and Oil companies are milking the rest of the world for something that doesnt truly belong to them to begin with. It belongs to all of the people on this planet...
If libtards are to get angry with anyone for "the people" it should be the governments of oil producing nations.
well to be fair most people don’t understand economics, much less the tremendous capital investment and technological know-how needed to operate exploration, drilling, extraction, refining operations. Add that to whatever silliness about belonging to everyone they have been infected with, and they can justify any expropriation from anyone/anything.
The one thing I do think is a justified issue is that a corp. can not be taxed on overseas ops, but a US citizen working overseas is 100% taxable on all income. I guess the issue is a corporation can change its citizenship/tax liability much more easily than a peon.
Well, they are certainly welcome to it.
Now if we can only convince them to stop using it, unless they drill and refine it themselves!
What twaddle! It belongs to those who go and get it. Imagine a world where each individual had to procure his own daily energy supply. Early nineteenth century? Eighteenth?
Regards,
GtG
Finally! Finally! An oil company is reporting facts while putting the numbers in perspective. The chart sure helps too.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.