Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejdrapes

He had to be pressed to say anything bad about Bachmann. However saying her record was NON EXISTENT was quite accurate

MB MIGHT have had a chance if only 2 things happened..First that Palin would not run, and secondly that she had not attacked Palin.

So if by some reason (GOD FORBID) Sarah does not run, Bachmann has already committed political suicide by attacking Palin.

MB does not have the character/judgment to be President, she proved that when she Okay-ed Rollins for the Palin attacks...not only that but her own comments ...such as...Refusing to answer Christian Post interviewer...If you do not run, could you support a Palin run for President? She would not answer

also comments like...Sarah Palin has nothing to do with me etc etc

Just think of the lost opportunity MB put on herself if Gov Palin does not run, she has totally lost a good portion of Palin supporters, and she only has herself to blame.

I am just glad that the truth about MB character has come out early. I have 210% written her off


183 posted on 07/10/2011 8:45:44 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (DID I MENTION......SARAH PALIN OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Friendofgeorge
Bachmann did not attack Palin. And what Ed Rollin said, he said basically around the time it was leaked he would be working for Bachmann. He hasn't said anything since and according to Politico personally apologized to Palin. This is the biggest non-story anti-Bachmann supporters continue to peddle. And it just makes them look like a bunch of cry babies whining that he hasn't apologized in public. As if, if he did they would accept it as genuine anyway. Hardly.

As far as Bachmann not having done much in congress, she was first elected in 2006. The GOP didn't take over congress until 2011. How much, realistically, could she accomplish with the Dems controlling congress? Besides, accomplishing things in DC usually means bad things for the country. I do know how she's voted on major issues and that's what is important to me.

Of course Bachmann is going to get hammered on the lack of 'executive experience'. That's fair. But for Pawlenty to be doing it now just shows what a weak candidate he is. He's the one with 'executive experience' and can't get above 6% in the polls and is well behind Bachmann in Iowa. If 'executive experience' was so important to voters wouldn't he be cleaning her clock in Iowa? Especially when he's spent so much time there in the last two months?

200 posted on 07/10/2011 9:10:29 AM PDT by ejdrapes (Can we keep our attacks focused on the real enemy: Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson