To: bamahead; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; BufordP; Avoiding_Sulla; Liz; indylindy; ...
He also suggested user fees for government services could provide additional revenue.
5 posted on
07/06/2011 6:16:34 PM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
User fees for services we already pay for. sweeeet!
13 posted on
07/06/2011 6:17:43 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: rabscuttle385
Hot damn, fees to pay for services we’re already taxed for.
I think they’re possessed by the spirit of Jenny Ganholm.
31 posted on
07/06/2011 6:23:09 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: rabscuttle385
What part of: We will try them and hang them on the Capitol Steps
Do they not understand?
74 posted on
07/06/2011 7:17:28 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: rabscuttle385
National Parks have user fees. You’re not amenable to raising those fees, provided we aren’t smart enough to hand the parks down to the states or eliminate them? After all, raising the fees to keep up w/inflation, in return for ELIMINATING taxpayer funding of the parks, sounds mighty pleasing to me.
To: rabscuttle385
We share the same take on it. I agree with you. Boehner is a big fat zero in my book.
154 posted on
07/07/2011 12:34:33 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
To: rabscuttle385
Hell, Bachmann has more b—ls than he does.
155 posted on
07/07/2011 12:35:16 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson