During the closing argument the prosecutor said “Someone in that house killed her.” There were three people “in that house”. He picked one of the three to prosecute. By saying that he told the jury there is a 33% chance Casey did it. He gave the jury an “out”. And not one pundit or poster wants to respond to that fact.
Reminds me of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. The mob wanted to lynch the guy before there was a trial. There are people on here and all over the world who want to lynch AFTER a trial with a “not guilty” verdict. That’s a mob mentality. And it’s scary to know people who call themselves conservatives want to do away with the rule of law. We either live by the law or we don’t.
[[By saying that he told the jury there is a 33% chance Casey did it. He gave the jury an “out”. And not one pundit or poster wants to respond to that fact.]]
Noone else other than Cacee had the motive to kill caylee, and NOONE else LIED for 31 datys while the other two in the hosue desperately searched for their granddaughter aqnd niece. ALL the other members of the hosuehold had to drill and drill and drill Casey in order to try to get a strasight answer out of her, which she NEVER gave them- EVERONE else in the hosuehold put all of their time into tryign to find Caylee, Everyoen EXCEPT Caycee who was still out whoring aroudn and partying and ‘living the good life’ while her family was desperate and not knowing which way to turn- Cacee partied and whored while her precious little daughter was rotting in a swamp and peopel all over florida were desperately tryign to find her
The prosecution did hteir job- they presented ENOUGH circumstantial evideence to clearly show that the ONLY person who had motive to kill Caylee was Caycee and ONLY Carcee- noone else. NOONE wants to do away with hte ‘rule of law’ the rule of law was NOT upheld- the jury was negligent i ntheir decision. This was a dry bones case, very little evidence, BUT ENOUGH evidence WAS given to show, at the very least, negligent crimkinal homicide.
The jury HAD to point to theories in order to justify their decision? Yet they REJECTED much more plausible theories presented by the prosecution? Nope- Justice was not done