[[By saying that he told the jury there is a 33% chance Casey did it. He gave the jury an “out”. And not one pundit or poster wants to respond to that fact.]]
Noone else other than Cacee had the motive to kill caylee, and NOONE else LIED for 31 datys while the other two in the hosue desperately searched for their granddaughter aqnd niece. ALL the other members of the hosuehold had to drill and drill and drill Casey in order to try to get a strasight answer out of her, which she NEVER gave them- EVERONE else in the hosuehold put all of their time into tryign to find Caylee, Everyoen EXCEPT Caycee who was still out whoring aroudn and partying and ‘living the good life’ while her family was desperate and not knowing which way to turn- Cacee partied and whored while her precious little daughter was rotting in a swamp and peopel all over florida were desperately tryign to find her
The prosecution did hteir job- they presented ENOUGH circumstantial evideence to clearly show that the ONLY person who had motive to kill Caylee was Caycee and ONLY Carcee- noone else. NOONE wants to do away with hte ‘rule of law’ the rule of law was NOT upheld- the jury was negligent i ntheir decision. This was a dry bones case, very little evidence, BUT ENOUGH evidence WAS given to show, at the very least, negligent crimkinal homicide.
The jury HAD to point to theories in order to justify their decision? Yet they REJECTED much more plausible theories presented by the prosecution? Nope- Justice was not done
Again you’re quoting stuff that wasn’t presented as evidence. The prosecution did NOT present a motive other than a theory that she wanted to party. I don’t buy it. Cindy took care of Caylee all the time. Plus many people testified she was a loving mother.
Everyone was busy looking for Caylee? I believe that would be everyone EXCEPT Casey AND George. George was a doting grandfather? He was busy out having an affair with a woman who volunteered to search for Caylee. She had his texts saying “I need you in my life”. In fact, while he was hitting on a woman he could have been reporting Caylee missing. That WAS presented as evidence. That makes it at least a 50% chance she didn’t do it. A forensinc shrink, regular contributor, said on Fox that George’s actions, suicide note, etc. is what he’s seen murderers do. But he’s never seen an innocent man do it. For some reason Fox hasn’t had him on since.
What bothers me is people who say they want the rule of law yet want to execute someone AFTER they’ve been found not guilty by a jury. And those of you who do are the ones who refuse to see the facts I listed above. In fact, you didn’t really respond to the prosecutor’s statement of “Someone in that house killed her”. I believe he let that slip the same way he let his laugh. If I was on the jury that would have been enough to vote not guilty.
I doubt very seriously you watched the entire trial. So you got a lot of “facts” from Nancy Grace, et al. Since I just gave you some facts that were presented as evidence, case closed. That means I want argue oppinion and TV evidence with you anymore so don’t waste the band width. Spend you time working on a new law that if enough “circumstancial evidence” is presented by the media no trial will be required. Guilty by the press!
The last thing I’ll say is just what the prosecutor said: “Someone in that house killed Caylee.” The parents are just as responsible as Casey.