I can’t tell if you missed what I was saying or not. I think you are implying that everyone who saw the entire trial and the evidence presented were wrong if they disagreed with the jury. You appear to calling it a mob because so many people disagree with the jury. Twelve different people on the jury might have convicted Ms Anthony.
During the closing argument the prosecutor said “Someone in that house killed her.” There were three people “in that house”. He picked one of the three to prosecute. By saying that he told the jury there is a 33% chance Casey did it. He gave the jury an “out”. And not one pundit or poster wants to respond to that fact.
Reminds me of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. The mob wanted to lynch the guy before there was a trial. There are people on here and all over the world who want to lynch AFTER a trial with a “not guilty” verdict. That’s a mob mentality. And it’s scary to know people who call themselves conservatives want to do away with the rule of law. We either live by the law or we don’t.