“I have no idea why anyone would put Duct Tape on a dead child. But it was not proven anyone did.”
Uh, there was duct tape on a dead child. That is beyond any doubt. What had to be REASONABLY asked is “Why would a dead child, bound up in plastic and thrown into the woods, have duct tape on it’s head?
TO answer that question, you have to ask and answer several COMMON SENSE questions. The ONLY answer that you arrive at is that the child was killed, whetherintentionally or unintentionally. For any juror to arrive at the conclusion that the child died accidently is asinine.
IF the child died in the swiming pool completely accidently, why was the child bound and dumped? There is NO REASONABLE explanation for that, and the defense provided no explanation. THe prosection provided the most reasonable answer - The child was killed. It doesn’t matter by who or how, but the child was killed.
You establish that fact and continue deliberating.
Someone has got to put the fire out in this insanity. Mob rule can not be allowed to run rampant. This is really sick and vile. Attacking this jury has got to be the most disgusting display I have ever witnessed. Please for all our sakes let it end.
AS I said earlier, if Casey was in the habit of drugging Caylee with chloroform to enable her to go out and kick up her heels at night, it could have been accident by administering too much chloroform. I doubt Casey has a very high IQ, so perhaps she put the duct tape over Caylee’s nose and mouth to hide the odor of the chloroform. IN NO WAY was Casey a good mother!