Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands of state workers forced to pay union fees
baltimoresun.com ^ | Jul 5 2011 | Julie Bykowicz

Posted on 07/05/2011 10:39:28 AM PDT by NoLibZone

Maryland's largest state employee union is set to begin collecting fees from nonmembers this month — a move that sets up the Maryland chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees for what could be a $4.7 million gain over the fiscal year.

AFSCME sees the additional money as a matter of fairness, since the union negotiates contracts with the state on behalf of all its bargaining members, though fewer than half pay dues. Union officials say the extra money will allow them to improve services.

But some of the 12,500 state workers who will find as much as a $389 bite out of their annual pay criticize the new fees.

"People like me, I don't have a lot of faith in unions," said Michael White, who works for the Motor Vehicle Administration in Glen Burnie.

The fees — which will also be collected by smaller unions such as the American Federation of Teachers — are allowed under The Fair Share Act, which the state legislature passed in 2009 largely on a party-line vote. Gov. Martin O'Malley, a pro-labor Democrat who benefited from strong union support in his re-election bid last year, had pushed the measure.

AFSCME Maryland represents 21,000 workers in collective bargaining with the state, but only 8,000 are dues-paying members. Another 4,000 workers not represented by AFSCME in contract negotiations pay dues to the union anyway, to tap benefits such as grievance representation.

"It's very exciting," said Sue Esty, AFSCME Maryland's assistant director. She has been with the organization for two decades. "We've always had a problem providing adequate service to our members because we have been so underfunded. This empowers employees."

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: NoLibZone

It looks like the majority are NOT members of the union. Can’t there be a motion to de-certify the union and then have the majority decide on weather they require representation?


21 posted on 07/05/2011 12:53:17 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Surely this is unconstitutional, right?..No, but one thing the state can do is tell the Union, We will not collect your dues from your members unless you pay us $100.00 per employee per paycheck to do so. Otherwise, have the employees send in their dues. What a shit storm THAT would create!


22 posted on 07/05/2011 12:58:34 PM PDT by Safetgiver (I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

weather = whether


23 posted on 07/05/2011 12:58:34 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

what if each individual forms a “union of one”?


24 posted on 07/05/2011 12:58:52 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Union officials say the extra money will allow them to improve services.

For Union officials.

Longer limousines. Higher salaries. More paid vacations in exotic locales. Etc.

25 posted on 07/05/2011 1:06:36 PM PDT by lowbridge (Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

“Union officials say the extra money will allow them to improve services.”

(In my best Tony Soprano voice)


26 posted on 07/05/2011 1:29:17 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

That’s why I plan to head to WI instead of MN. The lunacy of these commie libs, to force someone to pay for a ‘service’...

Obamacare anyone?


27 posted on 07/05/2011 2:20:03 PM PDT by max americana (FUBO NATION 2012 FAK BARAK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
About 325 employees also have objected on religious grounds. By law, they'll have to provide documentation showing that they make charitable donations in an amount equal to union dues.

Union Dues and Religions Do Nots

In the Foundation's booklet Union Dues and Religious Do Nots, Foundation Staff Attorney and Director of the Freedom of Conscience Project Bruce N. Cameron gives employees a guide to their legal rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, focusing on how to become a "religious objector" to union dues.

28 posted on 07/05/2011 4:41:09 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...

A union tax on non-members?

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


29 posted on 07/05/2011 8:38:50 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (July 23, 2017 - This is Ellis Wyatt. I am on strike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson