Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

“You are not there to deduce what might have happened.”

Like hell you aren’t. Deductive reasoning is unavoidable, particularly in a criminal trial. Unfortuantely, a lack of deductive reasoning is a major problem in this country. One can’t suspend their deductive reasoning abilities at the courthouse door.


2,637 posted on 07/06/2011 11:36:11 AM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2507 | View Replies ]


To: conservativebuckeye
You can used deductive reasoning to arrive at a verdict as to FACT.

The State still has to prove each element of the CHARGE.

The FACTS that the jury decides are not "what really happened", they are "did the State prove 1, 2, 3...."

It does not matter if the jurors think Casey killed Caylee. What matters is, did the State of Florida prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the elements of the various charged offenses were true.

2,680 posted on 07/06/2011 12:52:41 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2637 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson