The defence brought it up during the live testimony when they were trying to tie George to it.NO link but it was in the testimony somewhere that I heard.I can’t believe the prosecuter didn’t make it more of an issue.It had the company logo on the tape and was specifically made for the I believe 100th anniversary of Duct tape.
I am interested in crime and following trials but I have decided there needs to be a limit.
I can’t think of many places gov’t belongs— gov’t crushes freedom left and right and mostly I want gov’t to shut the L up and stand down.
Making money off a crime, a dead person... needs to be limited. Even an innocent, freed person shouldn’t make money off the murdered.
Even under the guise of buying photos. That’s full on BS and we all know it. It is a PAID interview!
More than Casey getting off, and my believing she’s guilty... doesn’t bother me nearly as much... as Casey getting rich off her daughters death.
Thanks, chris. If there was something special about that duct tape, I am surprised the prosecution did NOT make more of it. Although, if the jurors did not believe there was even decomp in the trunk (according to one FR’s summary of the alternate juror that spoke), I’m not sure it would have made much difference. That seemed incontrovertable.