That 's the whole problem (among others)in this case, know one KNOWS.
It can be speculated but no one can PROVE how or what happened.
Our justice system provides the charges be proved BEYOND a reasonable doubt, unfortunately that burden was not met.
Who knew it was that easy to kill your own kid and GET AWAY WITH IT. No alibi, no other plausible reason given. Wow.
Who knew there are active(proud) Freepers (read libertarians) as stupid and amoral as the Jerry Springer Jury seemed to be.
We got to get Scott Peterson and Casey together. They'd make a great couple.
We know without a doubt WHO that child was with when she went missing. Casey herself told investigators the date that 'Zanny' the 'nanny' did in the baby. (I have since learned that 'Zanny' for some is code for meds given to little ones who need to sleep while the adults party.) We know that Cindy was hunting Casey and Caylee by the 911 call made 31 days later. And there is NO doubt that Casey would not have waited until trial IF there was one shred of evidence to demonstrate that it was NOT her who killed and disposed of the body. She was offered two times a deal before the body was ever found to tell investigators where the body was. She could have turned in her father at that very time and already been out of jail if that claim had any veracity.
It’s a circumstantial case! I’m absolutely sick of your kind of excuse! Circumstantial means you HAVE to use Common Sense, if that even exists in this country any longer! It doesn’t mean you have to have prove what happened. I’m so pissed off with views like yours. There was a preponderance of circumstanlial evidense in this case, much, much, more than the evidense that sent Scott Peterson to death row.