I don’t disagree with that. Look, I support comments of healthy rebuttal. I know where you are coming from. Someone should make the case you are making. I’m not advocating the opposite in truth. I am merely stating that this is a case that is going to move people like very few other cases will.
Michelle Simpson was a grown woman. While people did see her as an innocent victim, there wasn’t the innocent child factor. It’s not going to help that this little girl was the prototypical little angel. She was a beautiful little girl.
This young child is going to be viewed as the immaculate victim. It’s just different.
About all we can do is wait and see. I’m not hoping something happens. I’ve just said that I know there are going to be some people that are quite worked up over this.
Take care.
"... I am merely stating that this is a case that is going to move people like very few other cases will."
Think so? Then I weep for my nation if you're right: We'll blissfully ignore bankers getting paid back all the money that they lost and pay not one minute of attention to our $14,000,000,000,000 debt ceiling being broken --- No torches and pitchforks there, but they'll be up in arms about this 3 year old little dead girl who was in all probability killed by her own mother that was just acquitted or murder?
I really doubt that, but if you're right it's time to cut the guy-wire and let the American flag fly free of the flagpole straight into the mud.
The murder of a little girl singularly outweighs every other outrage combined that we've seen over the last several years which actually DO directly affect most American's lives, unlike Caylee Anthony?
No way can you be right about this. You can't be. You'd goddamned better NOT be.