[wtc911]

First, I am sorry for pinging those of you other than Dio...but he included you all in a response which should have been to me alone...

Now, diogenesis, You can repeat and SHOUT the lie all you want...it won't make it true.

I posted the exact language of the EO that you selectively and deceitfully excerpted...I'll do it again...

""Parents’ Rights.The Department of State Health Services will, in order to protect the right of parents to be the final authority on their children’s health care, modify the current process in order to allow parents to submit a request for a conscientious objection affidavit form via the Internet while maintaining privacy safeguards under current law."

A thing cannot be a mandate if it contains an opt-opt clause that is available to all.

If you had any honor you would stop posting the lie.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

We’ve all tried to reason with, kid around with and be nice to the poster Diogenesis.

But he will not engage in conversation or an exchange of ideas or even say that his candidate (?—never given one that I’m aware of) has qualities that are better because.....

It has frustrated so many. I’m at a loss. All I see left to do, is ignore him.

Are there any rules on FR about “hit and run” spamming on threads? About stalking?

[Diogenesis]

You are a thoroughly dishonest poster
as this URL demonstrates. Typical RomneyBOT you are.

Critics rip Perry’s vaccine mandate
Governor rejects opponents’ calls to reverse order
AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry stood firm Monday
against a political firestorm generated
by his order that sixth-grade girls
be inoculated against a sexually transmitted
virus linked to cervical cancer.

Social conservatives from Texas to Washington
called on Perry to reverse his order making
Texas the first state to require the vaccine,
saying the mandate makes sex seem permissible
and that parents should be the ones to decide
whether to immunize their daughters.

And several Texas lawmakers expressed outrage
at Perry for circumventing the legislative process."

[raybbr]

...allow parents to submit a request for a conscientious objection affidavit form via the Internet while maintaining privacy safeguards under current law."

"Submit a request" does not guarantee it will be given. Had it been worded, "Parents will be allowed to decline the vaccine" I would agree. Or, better yet, "Parents will be required to sign an assent form for this vaccine".

In the EO Perry gives the ultimate power to the state as opposed to the parents. The parents are, in the way it's worded, secondary to the state.

Think U.S. Constitution and the way it was written to LIMIT govt not explicitly give govt right of way.