Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat

It is true you can rape a hooker, but lack consent becomes much more difficult to prove when he can say that she offered sex and he had no intention to pay. If he simply refused to pay her after the deed and there was a fight over it, there is no crime. She had no right to charge for sex so it isn’t theft, and there was no rape because the sex act was consensual.

Besides, she is changing her story too much now, this case is over.


5 posted on 07/03/2011 5:20:31 AM PDT by politicalmerc (The whole earth may move, but God's throne is never shaken. I think I'll stand by Him..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: politicalmerc

Duh, professional hookers always get the money up front. Alway, always, always. This is just a simple case of the guy being guilty as hell and. His defense is to convict the victim. Have not seen one factual thing about her changing her story, but have seen a lot of third party he said, she said, they said, bs, that does not mean anything.


7 posted on 07/03/2011 5:28:06 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson