Duh, professional hookers always get the money up front. Alway, always, always. This is just a simple case of the guy being guilty as hell and. His defense is to convict the victim. Have not seen one factual thing about her changing her story, but have seen a lot of third party he said, she said, they said, bs, that does not mean anything.
Here’s some “facts” for you: they dropped his million dollar bail for a PC bond. That doesn’t happen. I understand your point, and I even agree with you. However there is PLENTY reasonable doubt here. The credibility of the witness is shot and he has the money to fight.
I know you want this guy to be guilty, but its just not going to happen. By the way, the DA’s office said she was hooking in the hotel they put her up in, the Jail has the recording of the telephone call with a drug dealer about the financial windfall. You have the same source for the parts of the story you like as you do for the parts of the story you don’t like: the news. Unless you want to tell us now that you have some personal inside knowledge.
This case is cooked man. No offense it just is.
As for professional hookers always taking their money upfront, I won’t challenged your knowledge on that one! But I will say this: as a defense attorney I would make a lot of the fact she was a hooker at all. Her motivation could easily be MONEY, not the 50-250 she might make on a trick but the millions she would make by accusing the man of rape. The fact of this case is that you have a slimebag and a hooker going at each other. Its a tie, and in a criminal proceeding that means not guilty.