Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; The Magical Mischief Tour

Perhaps now that the Indiana Supremes have themselves opined, in the same decision, that the legislature ought to clarify its intent in its ban on public drunkenness, the effort to get that law narrowed will succeed. The legislature can’t pass the buck now. It’s insane not to permit people who became intoxicated away from home in a private place to be given a ride back home or some other private place.


12 posted on 07/01/2011 8:36:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I agree. I would also state that people have a right to go get sloshed at a public establishment too, if they desire to. As long as they don’t cause problems for the establishment or other patrons, it’s nobody’s damned business but their own.

It is absolutely dumfounding to think you can get arrested for being drunk in the back seat of a car, no other contributing factors.


59 posted on 07/02/2011 5:56:43 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck; DoughtyOne; The Magical Mischief Tour
Perhaps now that the Indiana Supremes have themselves opined, in the same decision, that the legislature ought to clarify its intent in its ban on public drunkenness, the effort to get that law narrowed will succeed.

Wonder how many EXECUTIVE LIMOS and PLEASURE LIMOS the police will be pulling over?

67 posted on 07/02/2011 9:48:13 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson