The documents relating to Kagan and the health-care issue that have been released thus far by the Justice Department are the result of a Freedom of Information Act request filed by CNSNews.com in May 25, 2010--before Kagan's confirmation hearings.
When I first saw this I thought the link was CBS news. How I WISH it were! Will America ever hear about this?? She MUST recuse herself for all of the Obamacare cases, but she also should be forced to step down from the bench for lying... I realize we will all be skiing in hell on THAT day...
Only 49? It should be every Republican.
If she is as smart as The Wise Latina, she will recuse herself from all things Obamacare.
If things continue as they have, at some point, the people will reject and pull down the rotten edifice of our government.
The question is when. Scotus approval of Obamacare should be the time to rip it all apart, for the Constitution by Scotus will have been flipped into a instrument of oppression.
Having lived in Chicago for many many years I recognize this as the Chicago style of governing. It has produced more politicians in striped jump suits than any other place I can recall. Chicago has been the mother of American Marxism and political corruption since the days of Bath House John and the 1st ward machine.
The fact that a Supreme Court Justice nominee would lie under oath to slip into confirmation is brazen and malicious. She is a judicial activist of the worst kind, IMO.
Take notice of the fact that they wanted an INVESTIGATION of the fat liberal slob, not IMPEACHMENT proceedings!
It’s all hot air and nothing else.
“Contradictory to her 2010 confirmation testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, recently released Department of Justice (DOJ) documents indicate that Justice Kagan actively participated with her Obama Administration colleagues in formulating a defense of PPACA,” the letter said.
*snip*
The House members signing their letter to the Judiciary Committee calling for an investigation of Kagan’s involvement in Obamacare noted in the letter that federal law prohibits a Supreme Court Justice from participating in a case where her impartiality might be reasonably questioned or where she expressed an opinion on the matter while serving in government office.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/breaking-49-house-members-call-investiga
~~~~~~~~~~
Ooh .. I hope they’ve nailed her dodge and spin at hearings.