Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name

I meant that Sarah was not the subject of my original reply to you - Romney was.

Ann didn’t defend Romney or Romneycare, IMO. Obviously, you disagree, but that doesn’t imply that I am denying anything.


26 posted on 06/30/2011 10:54:51 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
Ann didn’t defend Romney or Romneycare, IMO. Obviously, you disagree, but that doesn’t imply that I am denying anything.

So if you claim you aren't denying anything - then her comment when over your head. She did defend him - saying his romneycare fit the liberal state of MA.

And Sarah seems to be the only one who has a full life - so no need for her to run. Amazing!! Ann, you failed big time!
30 posted on 06/30/2011 11:26:15 PM PDT by presently no screen name ( The Palin Party: The Party of Patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson