To: presently no screen name
I meant that Sarah was not the subject of my original reply to you - Romney was.
Ann didn’t defend Romney or Romneycare, IMO. Obviously, you disagree, but that doesn’t imply that I am denying anything.
26 posted on
06/30/2011 10:54:51 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
To: BuckeyeTexan
Ann didnt defend Romney or Romneycare, IMO. Obviously, you disagree, but that doesnt imply that I am denying anything.
So if you claim you aren't denying anything - then her comment when over your head. She did defend him - saying his romneycare fit the liberal state of MA.
And Sarah seems to be the only one who has a full life - so no need for her to run. Amazing!! Ann, you failed big time!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson