To: BuckeyeTexan
Ann didnt defend Romney or Romneycare, IMO. Obviously, you disagree, but that doesnt imply that I am denying anything.
So if you claim you aren't denying anything - then her comment when over your head. She did defend him - saying his romneycare fit the liberal state of MA.
And Sarah seems to be the only one who has a full life - so no need for her to run. Amazing!! Ann, you failed big time!
To: presently no screen name
then her comment when over your head. She did defend him -saying his romneycare fit the liberal state of MA. No, her comment didn't go over my head. I simply disagree with your assessment that she was defending Romney or Romneycare. As I said, it sounded to me like she was listing reasons that voters (and she) could use to justify a vote for Romney if it comes down to a choice between him and Obama.
I happen to disagree with her about the impact of Romneycare. It was the blueprint for Obamacare and Romney needs to wear it as an albatross around his neck. I don't see myself voting for Romney no matter how many justifications there might be for signing Romneycare into law in ultra-liberal MA.
33 posted on
06/30/2011 11:40:32 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson