>>Parents had a “sacred trust” to shield children from corrupting influences and to safeguard their development into responsible citizens.<<
I hope this doesn’t indicate how he will vote when Michelle tells us what we can and can’t eat. But it’s the same logic. Yikes.
That is the point....michelle is the government. A really sick non logical society is one that rationalizes urinating and torturing a girl and saying it is not obscene and allowing it to be marketed. It should have no legal protection whatsoever, which is exactly how the Founders would have thought.
Scalia has no knowledge of Natural Law Theory or ignores it’s influence in the Constitution....it is the basis of our laws...inalienable rights come from God and are non negotiable, yet Scalia has said, in his ignorance, that States should be allowed to vote for the right for women to kill their babies....and possibly, deny the baby their inalienable right to life. What does Scalia not understand about inalienable rights? Why would the place of a human being affect their “life”?
Thomas totally gets it. He is an expert on Natural Law and understands the Constitution as it was written. There is a law to judge obscenity-—it is God’s laws....in the founding documents and it is easy to understand those Universal Laws which are the bases of our Constitution (or it was before they adopted Marx’s moral relativity where law becomes arbitrary whims of whomever!!!!like that homosexual judge in SF.
We no longer have “Just Law”—we have unequal law which gives “rights” to minorities and takes them away from others whom they “think” deserve the discrimination. It is the powerful elites pretending to be god and determining their own right and wrong....not based on God’s law which is in the Founding Documents!
What we have is unconstitutional laws and Thomas thoroughly understands that...and that is why the Marxists are trying to get him off the court 24/7. He is the smartest one on the court.
He’s stating that the parents, not the wookie in chief, have the sacred trust.