You are one of them, your only argument is to give the law to them, while we all go Gandhi and stay out of it.
You support the gains of the left against what you see as us using laws to create our communities and regulate the extremes, rather than doing nothing except chanting that ‘morality is within’ laws are useless and wrong.
The proper thing to do when the pimps and hookers, and pornographers, and homosexuality, get out of control in your city, is to pass laws and enforce them, not to lock your door and chant, ‘what will be be, will be’.
The only difference is the morality you would see enforced.
I don't drink enough to ever get drunk. I support laws against public drunkenness. But I think prohibition was and is a ridiculous notion.
I never have and never will engage the services of a prostitute. I support laws against prostitution. But I recognize that it is a human universal throughout time and all cultures and that laws will not prevent it.
Pornography is available on every computer. Do you think they should ban it? I am against public displays of such and was glad that 7-Eleven and other retailers started keeping it behind the counter or with a screen over the cover after public condemnation.
Homosexuality is also a human universal in every time and all cultures. They have a right to parade and such on THEIR parade (like even the Nazis do here in America where we have freedom) - I am against enforced parade inclusion (Fireman parades and such in NYC) under the Constitutional grounds of freedom of association.
Forced inclusion is just the nannyState enforcement of a different morality.
I am against such things consistently based upon the idea of a limited government of enumerated powers and sovereign citizens.
The laws that are getting passed and enforced in San Francisco are based upon the same theory of governance that you believe in, it will just be a different morality enforced.