The only difference is the morality you would see enforced.
I don't drink enough to ever get drunk. I support laws against public drunkenness. But I think prohibition was and is a ridiculous notion.
I never have and never will engage the services of a prostitute. I support laws against prostitution. But I recognize that it is a human universal throughout time and all cultures and that laws will not prevent it.
Pornography is available on every computer. Do you think they should ban it? I am against public displays of such and was glad that 7-Eleven and other retailers started keeping it behind the counter or with a screen over the cover after public condemnation.
Homosexuality is also a human universal in every time and all cultures. They have a right to parade and such on THEIR parade (like even the Nazis do here in America where we have freedom) - I am against enforced parade inclusion (Fireman parades and such in NYC) under the Constitutional grounds of freedom of association.
Forced inclusion is just the nannyState enforcement of a different morality.
I am against such things consistently based upon the idea of a limited government of enumerated powers and sovereign citizens.
The laws that are getting passed and enforced in San Francisco are based upon the same theory of governance that you believe in, it will just be a different morality enforced.
LOL, that would be a huge difference, but even that isn't the fact, good laws promote a good society, the left has converted the law into a libertarian club to destroy American culture and society, and our communities.
You just changed your tune and listed laws that you do approve of, I noticed that I was right about you supporting the homosexual agenda, the gay agenda is always a tell for you guys, it proves that you are not conservative.
The Warren Court lives in your hearts.