[BillyBoy]

editor-surveyor is right. Wolfcreek, you seem to have a difficult time seeing the point I'm making about the double-standards used by Perry supporters. I'll try to explain it a third time. There are certain talking points that Perry for President advocates are using. There are two major gists to their argument for Perry:

1) Nobody is perfect, therefore you should stop criticizing Perry's record as Governor. If you criticize Perry, you must be demanding perfection.

2) Sarah Palin's endorsements ARE perfect, therefore you should not question them. If Sarah Palin endorses Rick Perry (even if she only endorsed him for Governor and NOT President), that's absolutely rock-solid irrefutable PROOF he is the best man for the job. No further evidence is needed. If you disagree with it, you must hate Sarah.

And I wrong or is Rick Perry's fan club contradicting themselves? If nothing is perfect, then how come Sarah Palin's endorsements are infalliable? There's no logic to these pro-Perry arguments.

[wolfcreek]

Yep, you and the editor are full of yourselves. ;>)

I didn’t say stop this or campaign for that, I told you what I’m going to do. That’s it!

Take it up with somebody who fits ya’ll *mold*.