Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes, but a decent underwriter would be able to take that into consideration.

A 10% downpayment is more reasonable.

But “forcing” a 20% downpayment is just silly.

Again, the government has no business directing a private business on how they should conduct themselves. The mortgage business worked just fine for a couple of hundred years.


63 posted on 06/30/2011 1:54:07 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Is there anyone that Obama won't toss under the bus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt
I suspect the 20% "enforcement" will only be for people who are not Eric Holder's people.

And you're right. Banks are in the business of making loans at an interest rate commensurate with the risk. The higher the risk of a loan to an individual, the higher the interest rate for that loan.

But to the swells in Washington, that's "racist."

Eric Holder's people have historically had a much higher default rate than any other group, which means they were being held to a lower standard.

And even that wasn't enough. Nothing will be enough except handing them free stuff forever and always Amen.

64 posted on 06/30/2011 1:58:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson