Posted on 06/30/2011 6:46:03 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Typical Liberal action - everybody loses, no one wins.
> The U.S. Supreme Court in 1992 ruled that states cannot
> tax businesses that aren’t physically within their
> boundaries. Such taxes would regulate interstate
> commerce, which is a federal government prerogative
So, how can Californicate pass this tax?
Is it because the Feds don’t enforce anti-tax decisions or provisions anymore?
Are taxes or any kind another form of Holders’ “People”?
Or is it because Holders’ “People” benefit most from confiscatory taxes?
What’s the old saying about people pay taxes not businesses?
Nevertheless, way to go CA, drive more business away.
Groups similar to this “California Retailers Association” have been running radio ads here in the Philly market, begging people to “call their representatives” to tell them to pass a similar tax in PA.
“The state Board of Equalization”
...WTH!? I’m in VA and we don’t have one of these. Thank the Lord!
Sounds like something out of Atlas Shrugged. What next? The Anti-Dog-Eat-Dog Rule?
In other news:
O.C. manufacturer moves, adds 270 jobs in D.C.
Nobody expected the Spanish Inquisition!
Part of the problem with liberal math is they look at a big number like “online sales” and think their new tax regulation is going to apply to that big number. The problem is that a HUGE portion of that big “online sales” number is already collecting sales taxes. Every sale on Walmart.com or BestBuy.com or BarnesandNoble.com or HomeDepot.com or Academy.com or similar retailers’ online catalog is already taxed at the sales tax rate of the purchaser’s state. So CA or similar states will not see some big increase in tax revenue.
Not that it will change anything.
bookmark
Mission accomplished: More unemployment, more dependency, more weakening of the economy.
The State Board of Equalization is CA’s IRS. Has been in existence for a long, long time.
Not only will the expected revenue not be generated, all web retailers who have CA affiliates will drop those affiliates, which means the income tax generated by the income these affiliates make, plus the sales taxes they pay when buying things in CA, will be lost when all those jobs are lost. Rather than and increase in revenue I see a loss.
Which state will be the last holdout? You know this is going to snowball, as states view this as “easy money” and if all states do it, none will be held to account.
Good for Amazon - cause and effect is an excellent teaching method, but it only works if the entity to be burdened is willing to walk away.
That name is eerily similar to the "Equalization of Opportunity" bill in Atlas Shrugged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.