I WAS WRONG ABOUT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE and got the zot (again)

CNN ^ | 6/27/11 | David Frum

[DJ MacWoW]

Hmmm... it would seem that the real threat is from illegal immigration.

Hmmmmmmmmmm, didn't think this through, did you.

[darkangel82]

That is to be expected since he is a Canadian Liberal.

[Quix]

Hmmm

THX FOR THE PING.

[Quix]

INDEED.

And call em all what they are:

REgressives.

[metmom]

IBTZ

[Quix]

Seems to me he’s only commented once since starting the thread.

Perhaps he bears watching by some of the kitties, if you could alert them.

[Fu-fu2]

#33—good post. I remember back in the 70’s, accidentally attending one of the first “gay pride” parades. I was in the neighborhood visiting friends and didn’t know anything about it. The cleaned up version they now show on tv, attended by local politicians and news readers to show their “open-mindedness”, is another example of what you speak of. What has been seen cannot be unseen. I know exactly what they are....

[wagglebee]

There was also this comment:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2741602/posts?page=41#41

Everything I’ve seen indicates that the Hispanic community is very much opposed to homosexual “marriage” as is the black community. Homosexual “marriage” is simply the latest attempt by white liberals to advance Marxism.

[Quix]

Hmmmmmm

[wagglebee]

It seems rather suspicious that someone would join FR immediately after homosexual "marriage" is legalized in NY and then two days later post an editorial that praises homosexuality and then try to change the subject altogether.

[Quix]

Yeah.

I like to give folks lots of grace and lots of benefit of the doubt.

However, on such issues and practices, tactics . . . I have rapidly decreasing patience.

[wagglebee]

I'm inclined to give newcomers the benefit of the doubt, but to post a thread that is so contrary to conservatism and try to change the subject to something else is highly suspicious.

[Quix]

INDEED.

BTW, Much appreciate our continued cordiality toward one another.

[cycjec]

He’s worse than the “Incurious Economists” Jennifer Roback
Morse dissection on American Thinker about a year ago.
From memory: same-sex “marriage” restructures the incentives
for child-rearing and much else. Economists, who pride
themselves in assessing the effect of incentives, are
curiously indifferent, and assume that same-sex “marriage”
will affect only those currently identified with the cause.
The entire culture, including the state’s coercive apparatus
will be pressed into service. ... “Partnering” with someone
of the same sex will be an option for anyone. ...with
a myriad of deleterious results she details at length,
and which show that Frum is absolutely wrong here.

[cycjec]

For some brains, see Jennifer Roback Morse, “The Case of
The Incurious Economists”. I quoted her in an earlier
comment.

[wagglebee]

It appears that No Brain has now been zotted.

[wagglebee]

What were the troll's previous names?

[Godzilla]

It appears that No Brain has now been zotted.

Well, that was a no brainer (sorry I had to)

[Jim Robinson]

Here’s one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2729423/posts

And another: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2708242/posts

And another: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2703175/posts

And zirt, zurt, zort, zorto, zaart, etc, etc, etc.

[wagglebee]

So, this was zort returned from the zotted.