Hmmm. I’m wondering where I made the statement that Emily Good needed to prove anything, let alone that she made a statement as per the officer’s videotaped statement. No, I was referring to the fact that you have judged and convicted the officer - thus, guilty until proven innocent. This woman, according to you was given her day in court (which didn’t happen), and was found innocent (not true). The officer, according to your position, does not deserve such treatment. He, unlike the “private citizen” must be guilty on the spot, and there is no need for any further investigation. Perhaps you’d also be fine with the evidence of the video disappearing?
Your post #109:
Oh, yes. Please accept the postion of those who support this liberal POS who went looking for trouble so she could file this suit. You have no evidence the woman DIDN’T make any comments or statements to the officer, but you’ll run with that lack of evidence anyway. Incredible.
Duh. The evidence that she did or did not make any comments or statements to the officer does not exist. No one has any obligation to prove that she DIDN'T. The officer has a duty to prove that she DID.
Shouldn't be hard with a yard full of witnesses and two other cops on scene...
This woman, according to you was given her day in court (which didn’t happen), and was found innocent (not true).
Where did I say that?
You're flailing.