Her speech was pitiful. I’ve heard better campaign speeches for student council
I thought her answer to Chris Wallace about the 10th amendment was confusing. On one hand she supports a state's right to decide on gay marriage. She's all for that. She's all for a state's right to self-govern and so forth. Something the Tea Party crowd really appreciates, and so do I.
But the next words out of her mouth were that she wants a constitutional amendment to supercede state law allowing gay marriage. But this is talking out both sides of her mouth. You want a state to decide, and you push the 10th amendment, but at the same time you want to squash the 10th amendment with federal authority.
I'm still scratchin' my bald head...