Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourPeas
RE :”You nailed it, and I think Wallace realized it after he'd said it. It's the reason he interrupted her with the clarification. It was obvious from the start of the question, when he had to rephrase, that he wasn't doing a good job putting what he wanted to ask into words.

Vetting Republican candidates is important but Wallace doesnt ask other guests insults like that.

How do you answer a personal insult like that anyway? A processional would have cited examples of her comments and asked her to defend them.

101 posted on 06/27/2011 6:40:27 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

Wallace has asked questions like this in the past. It’s part of his style. He frames the question with background, then asks a very blunt question that puts the interviewee on the spot. He did a poor job of framing the question this time.

The response to such a question needs to be as blunt as the question is. Gingrich (not “my” candidate, btw) did a good job when asked about his “food-stamp president” remark. It’s an opportunity to go on the attack and show some fire.

Sadly, Bachmann’s answer wasn’t as strong as it should have been IMO. She normally does a good job of being forceful. If I had to guess, I’d say she expected that Wallace was a “friendly interviewer” and was caught off-guard. Having said that, I should mention I haven’t seen the program yet, but the end of the previous question had both Bachmann and Wallace chuckling.


117 posted on 06/27/2011 6:59:24 AM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson