Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs

Wallace has asked questions like this in the past. It’s part of his style. He frames the question with background, then asks a very blunt question that puts the interviewee on the spot. He did a poor job of framing the question this time.

The response to such a question needs to be as blunt as the question is. Gingrich (not “my” candidate, btw) did a good job when asked about his “food-stamp president” remark. It’s an opportunity to go on the attack and show some fire.

Sadly, Bachmann’s answer wasn’t as strong as it should have been IMO. She normally does a good job of being forceful. If I had to guess, I’d say she expected that Wallace was a “friendly interviewer” and was caught off-guard. Having said that, I should mention I haven’t seen the program yet, but the end of the previous question had both Bachmann and Wallace chuckling.


117 posted on 06/27/2011 6:59:24 AM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: FourPeas

Bachmann has weaknesses that Wallace could ask about but it came off as him calling her a flake. It came off as a suggestion not a question.


124 posted on 06/27/2011 7:06:38 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson