Well, so far you still haven’t evidenced any understanding of why someone would support a man against the likes of Obama, vs the likes of Hayworth. Perhaps you think Hayworth was just like Obama.
I believe I asked you to provide a list of Conservatives that had endorsed John McCain in 2010 several times. I’m still waiting.
That would be a very good place to start, if you’re tying to exonerate someone else who did.
And so far, you've just killed your own definition of conservatism. If you don't compromise beliefs, how and the world do you justify supporting McCain?
You have your list, darling. Where have I denied that Sarah Palin supported McCain? Where's my explanation as to why Hayworth couldn't win re-election? Or the name of a conservative who has NEVER endorsed a RINO? Of, I forget, McCain is the gosh darn devil, a puppet of Soros.
You see, you're stuck on that election, and in the process, you've bastardize YOUR definition of conservatism by parsing beliefs in a Presidential election versus Obama.
You said:
Rintense, what you are defending goes against everything I believe as a Conservative. You are buttressing the idea that it's perfectly okay to support a man that would do harm to your nation, rather than support a man that would be better.
Now tell me, who do you think would harm the country more?
Based on your own words, I'd bet you'd vote for McCain again over Obama.
I wouldn't.
Let me ask you this, and its a fair question:
Do you believe that those who support Palin are not conservative?