Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kincaid: Is the FBI Investigating Obama?
GOPUSA.com ^ | June 23, 2011 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 06/25/2011 8:43:09 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Iam1ru1-2

bttt


41 posted on 06/25/2011 10:19:16 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (Anarchy IS the strategy of the forces of darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

SFL


42 posted on 06/25/2011 10:19:35 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mardi59

It’s good they won’t impeach; no one can accuse anyone other than Obama himself of his failures and if he’s a one term president, he will end up more of a disgrace. No one will be able to accuse whites of conspiring to destroy Obama. Let him destroy himself and let the country pay the price for electing him.


43 posted on 06/25/2011 10:22:45 PM PDT by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

The slimy Eric Holder was given his post specifically to spike/whitewash anything that could touch Ubama. Forget about the FBI “investigating Ubama” - - it ain’t happening. Sheesh.


44 posted on 06/25/2011 10:23:44 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Red Steel; seekthetruth; ...

..Ding!

As the FBI does not vet presidential candidates for national security purposes, we know there would have been no FBI investigation into Obama’s own background, associations, loyalty, and overall fitness for office. The FBI only probes those being considered for some federal positions under the president. They should have therefore investigated Panetta.

But there is no indication that he was ever properly vetted. Now he is confirmed as Secretary of Defense because conservative Republican Senators were apparently afraid of being accused of McCarthyism for questioning his past associations.


45 posted on 06/25/2011 10:32:54 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

For what it’s worth, the Ulsterman Washington Insider said more than once that the scandal that was bubbling up to the surface went from DC to Chicago and back to DC.


46 posted on 06/25/2011 10:32:56 PM PDT by Miss Behave ("It's not going to happen." ~Bibi The Badass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Our military knows all about him...they do their own investigations....


47 posted on 06/25/2011 10:38:41 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 "Woe unto those who say they are Judah and are not, but are of the synaGOGue of Satan.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: shield

And .. what, who has the indescribably embedded guts and courage to forsake all, take a stand and do anything about it?


48 posted on 06/25/2011 10:41:20 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

It should be clear to anyone with half a brain that these people are traitors to this country.


49 posted on 06/25/2011 10:56:54 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Just a bunch of talk. Heard it when Clinton was president. Tired of it. Nothing will come of it now, nor after he leaves office. He’s part of the in-crowd now, composed of elitists from both parties. They protect each other.


50 posted on 06/25/2011 10:58:24 PM PDT by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
"The obvious question is why Obama, as a state senator in Illinois, would ever have “crossed paths” with such people. The answer goes beyond just union support for the candidate. The “far-left” networks that include the FRSO, the Communist Party USA,..."

I've heard the Communist Party USA was the first group to endorse young obama when he was running for State office in Illinois... probably just coincidence. I mean, they had to endorse somebody, right?

51 posted on 06/25/2011 11:05:34 PM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Now he is confirmed as Secretary of Defense because conservative Republican Senators were apparently afraid of being accused of McCarthyism for questioning his past associations.

This has the smell of Mitch McConnell all over it.
We may have a few Republican senators who would have fought this, but after McConnell got through twisting arms and threatening, they faded.
I would also like to know what Reid used to get Mitch to look the other way when treason was happening.........Again.

52 posted on 06/25/2011 11:34:34 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

“The obvious question is why Obama, as a state senator in Illinois, would ever have “crossed paths” with such people. The answer goes beyond just union support for the candidate. The “far-left” networks that include the FRSO, the Communist Party USA,...”

I’ve heard the Communist Party USA was the first group to endorse young obama when he was running for State office in Illinois... probably just coincidence. I mean, they had to endorse somebody, right?

You of course are correct: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/communist-party-backs-obama/

I heard a radical Marxist chuckle and say wryly, “I’m an Obama Democrat.”


53 posted on 06/25/2011 11:37:30 PM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now (From 1963 Congressional Record http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Wanna bet that at the inauguration of Sarah Palin (or whoever) in 2013, the Bummer will simply be spirited away to parts unknown of deepest Africa, never to be heard from again”

Nope, I’m sure he’ll be a proud former prez, write more books, give speeches, etc.

BUT - if we’re blessed enough to win the election, our next president better NOT play the “gracious winner”, wimp out and not pursue all possible investigation and exposure of BHO. We the people deserve it. None of this “let bygones be bygones”.


54 posted on 06/25/2011 11:46:36 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Hmmm.....I seem to remember someone during the election 2008 accusing Obama of palling around with terrorists. Looks like she was right on the money...again!!

Why, oh why, did no on else support her full attack on Obama?


55 posted on 06/25/2011 11:53:38 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llandres
BUT - if we’re blessed enough to win the election, our next president better NOT play the “gracious winner”, wimp out and not pursue all possible investigation and exposure of BHO. We the people deserve it. None of this “let bygones be bygones”.

If - by God's grace - it will be Palin, at least she has a record of rooting out corruption.

56 posted on 06/25/2011 11:56:19 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: matchgirl

“I have long wondered why there is no FBI background security check on all Presidential candidates as anyone can throw his/her hat in the ring.”

Amen to that. We live in dangerous times with enemies both domestic and (new breed of) foreign, and these days they work together and sometimes are one and the same.

Lord knows the media and “journalists” only vet non-Democrats, never one of their own. The Presidency should be most of all subject to background security check.

Is this something that could be brought up in Congress and voted on? I mean, in a perfect world :-)


57 posted on 06/26/2011 12:07:13 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: matchgirl
I have long wondered why there is no FBI background security check on all Presidential candidates as anyone can throw his/her hat in the ring.

My guess is that it is to keep an administration from politicizing the FBI and then using its investigation as a tool against opposition candidates.

58 posted on 06/26/2011 12:40:51 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The obvious question is why Obama, as a state senator in Illinois, would ever have “crossed paths” with such people. The answer goes beyond just union support for the candidate. The “far-left” networks that include the FRSO, the Communist Party USA, the New American Movement, and the Democratic Socialists of America backed and even spawned Obama’s political career.

Indeed they did. One of the many items I saved back in '08 during the Presidential campaign.........

Democratic Socialists of America Founded the "New Party", Whose Sept.-Oct. 1995 Newsletter states Obama was seeking membership.

scroll down the page to see........

Chicago New Party Update

About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions. The NP's political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to "win". This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.

The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia's District; and Barack Obama , chief of staff for State Sen. Alice Palmer. Obama is running for Palmer's vacant seat.

*snip*

Indeed it was an exciting evening because the NP has two crucial components. First, the NP is a true "Rainbow Coalition" consisting of both young and aged African-Americans, Hispanics and Caucasians. Although ACORN and SEIU Local 880 were the harbingers of the NP , there was a strong presence of CoC and DSA (15% DSA).

*snip*

Obviously he joined. From 1996.....

October 1996 Update:
Running to Win: The Key Races

*snip*

Illinois: Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).

*snip*

Regular folks like us vetted this jerk like crazy, yet the FBI and others never bothered?
With luck, when we send this info out AGAIN during the upcoming campaigns, more people will pay attention!

59 posted on 06/26/2011 1:06:46 AM PDT by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Some, from the article.
FRSO, Communist Party USA, New American Movement,
Democratic Socialists of America, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn. Throw in millions in untraceable campaign funds, his
sealed past, hidden identity, accomplices in the media and
you have a fraud known as a Manchurian Candidate.


60 posted on 06/26/2011 1:21:26 AM PDT by Slambat (The right to keep and bear arms. Anything one man can carry, drive or pull.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson