Skip to comments.
Judge rules that Joe Miller must pay state legal fees
Anchorage Daily News ^
| 06/25/2011
| BECKY BOHRER
Posted on 06/25/2011 10:23:11 AM PDT by Hawk720
An Alaska judge on Friday ordered that failed U.S. Senate candidate Joe Miller pay more than $17,300 in legal costs incurred by the state in fighting Miller's challenge to last year's election. But Judge William Carey said Miller won't have to pay legal bills for his rival, Sen. Lisa Murkowski.
In state court, when no money is at issue in the litigation, winning parties can seek up to 20 percent of their attorney fees. For the state, in this instance, that came to $17,373.85. Carey said Murkowski, who intervened in the case, was not a prevailing party.
Attorneys for all three parties said Friday afternoon that they hadn't seen the order and declined comment.
Miller sued over the state's handling of the election and counting of votes for Murkowski, who mounted an unprecedented write-in campaign after losing the GOP primary to tea party favorite Miller last August.
(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; joemiller; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
06/25/2011 10:23:13 AM PDT
by
Hawk720
To: Hawk720
It is precisely this kind of crap that makes "loser pays" such a bad idea. If we really want to address frivolous lawsuits, then change the standard of proof in civil cases to match those of criminal cases, and apply 5th amendment protections to defendants in such suits.
The additional burden of proof thrown unto the plaintiff will discourage significant numbers of frivolous lawsuits.
2
posted on
06/25/2011 10:28:34 AM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Hawk720
Murkowski family payback...
3
posted on
06/25/2011 10:30:07 AM PDT
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
Murcowski: seems to me I remember that name. Isn’t she the RINO Republican that democrats elected ?
4
posted on
06/25/2011 10:34:54 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Venturer
I remember now, Her daddy gave her the job and told her it belonged to her by right of inheritance.
5
posted on
06/25/2011 10:36:20 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Hawk720
So this will also apply to the WI female that lost. Can’t remember her name. /s
6
posted on
06/25/2011 10:41:17 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(VOTE out the RATS! Go Sarah!)
To: TribalPrincess2U
So this will also apply to the WI female that lost.Only if she is a Republican. Our nation is creeping closer to Civil War II with every tilted judicial ruling.
To: kittycatonline.com
The Judge (Carey) was appointed by Sarah Palin and applied Alaska law as written to essentially undisputed facts — the loser has to repay the state 20% of the state’s costs in this circumstance. It isn’t cause for even mild alarm, much less civil war.
8
posted on
06/25/2011 11:29:56 AM PDT
by
rot.com
To: rot.com
The Judge (Carey) was appointed by Sarah Palin and applied Alaska law as written to essentially undisputed facts the loser has to repay the state 20% of the states costs in this circumstance. It isnt cause for even mild alarm, much less civil war.I wonder if all the people that wanted Miller to keep fighting long after it was clear he'd lost are going to pony up and help him pay off these legal expenses.
To: Longbow1969
I wonder if all the people that wanted Miller to keep fighting long after it was clear he'd lost are going to pony up and help him pay off these legal expenses.I wonder if he could use any remaining $ from his campaign? Seems reasonable to me.
To: kittycatonline.com
I wonder if he could use any remaining $ from his campaign? Seems reasonable to me.Yeah, I think he could if he has anything left in the till.
To: kittycatonline.com
I suspect that he can, although I don’t know that for sure. As another poster noted, this is the real-world result of “loser pays” legislation.
12
posted on
06/25/2011 12:06:59 PM PDT
by
rot.com
To: darkwing104
No. Miller had legal troubles before he came up against Murkowski. Even though he is a lawyer, he does seem to understand how the law works and that he is not above it. Also, if you live by the sword, you die by the sword. He was the one who instigated the challenge to the vote.
Miller is a sleazy, lying carpetbagger.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Miller_(Alaska_politician)
13
posted on
06/25/2011 12:13:56 PM PDT
by
La Enchiladita
(It should be illegal for illegals to play with matches... just sayin'...)
To: Venturer
Murkowski was never a Democrat although Sarah Palin's emails clearly indicate there's evidence that she covered up bribes accepted by her father when he was Governor.
Think of Lisa as an un-indicted co-conspirator in a massive criminal enterprise.
14
posted on
06/25/2011 1:04:53 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: La Enchiladita
Look, just about everybody but Todd Palin and my relatives are carpetbaggers in Alaska.
15
posted on
06/25/2011 1:05:57 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Hawk720
miller sure turned out to be a disappointment.
my wife and i sent him a campaign donation.
16
posted on
06/25/2011 1:21:57 PM PDT
by
ken21
(liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
To: La Enchiladita
The only sleazy liar is Lisa Murkowski. She lost the GOP nomination fair and square and broke the spirit of the law to get herself the office for which she lost with the liberal help from her Democrat buddies.
17
posted on
06/25/2011 1:56:39 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: kittycatonline.com
Our nation is creeping closer to Civil War II with every tilted judicial ruling.I often say Civil War III. The American Revolution was a Civil War of sorts.
To: kittycatonline.com
The reason I say that is because many people think that the Civil War known to most was a one time thing, with the illusion that it was an oddity that won't happen again.
People will usually say, "Another Civil War. Today? This is America".
To: rot.com
The Judge (Carey) was appointed by Sarah Palin and applied Alaska law as written to essentially undisputed facts
- Just because the judge was appointed by Palin does not mean they are beholden to her political ideology. They could be a fire breathing liberal socialist and we'd never know it otherwise.
- The part about "and applied Alaska law", there is no guarantee this was done so out of a respect of law; it could have been pure liberal personal spite for Joe Miller. Were the election different and it was Murkowski before this same judge, would anybody be shocked if the "loser pays" law was conveniently ignored?
the loser has to repay the state 20% of the states costs in this circumstance. It isnt cause for even mild alarm, much less civil war.By itself, of course not. But combined with the never-ending legislative and judicial and executive sewage overspill of liberal legal decisions, open hostility to Christians specifically and conservatives in general, and a complete and utter disgust for our nation's Constitution, it is only a matter of time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson