Posted on 06/24/2011 11:30:31 AM PDT by Mount Athos
Republicans recently have watched multiple Romneys at war with each other over abortion, ethanol, global warming, and more. Alas, this is nothing new. Various Romneys have battled themselves on issues as old as the Vietnam War.
“I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there and in some ways it was frustrating not to feel like I was there as part of the troops that were fighting in Vietnam,” Hawkish Romney said in the June 24, 2007, Boston Globe while running as a conservative for 2008’s GOP nomination.
But Romney sang a softer song while campaigning for Senate in liberal Massachusetts. “I was not planning on signing up for the military,” dovish Romney said in the May 2, 1994, Boston Herald. “It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.”
Just last week, Romney spooked pro-lifers by refusing to sign the Susan B. Anthony List’s pledge to nominate anti-abortion judges and other federal officials. Romney properly noted that this promise might block, say, a pro-choice spy master from leading the electronic sleuths at the National Security Agency, which does not address abortion. Still, this dustup underscored Romney’s bipolarity on this key issue.
“I believe that abortion is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother,” pro-life Romney wrote in the July 26, 2005, Boston Globe.
But less than three years earlier, in October 2002, pro-choice Romney disagreed: “Let me make this very clear. I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose.”
“Government under President Obama has grown to consume almost 40 percent of our economy,” pro-enterprise Romney said June 2. “We are only inches away from ceasing to be a free-market economy.”
“I support the subsidy of ethanol,” rent-seeking Romney said on May 27 in Iowa, however. “I believe ethanol is an important part of our energy solution for this country.”
Four days earlier, former governor Tim Pawlenty (R, Minn.) bravely opposed ethanol subsidies in Iowa. Nonetheless, Romney bear-hugged this boondoggle — weeks before the U.S. Senate voted 73–27 on June 16 to terminate the ethanol tax credit.
“I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that,” CO2-fighting Romney said on June 3. “I think it’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants, of greenhouse gases, that may well be significant contributors to the climate change and global warming that you’re seeing.”
Romney earned a wave of the scepter from none other than the pope of the global-warming church, former vice president Albert Gore Jr.
“Good for Mitt Romney,” Gore wrote on June 15. “While other Republicans are running from the truth, he is sticking to his guns in the face of the anti-science wing of the Republican Party.”
“Governor Romney,” CNN’s John King asked at a June 13 GOP debate in New Hampshire, “constitutional amendment or state decision [to ban gay marriage]?”
“Constitutional,” replied traditional-values Romney.
Conversely, modern-values Romney, said in an Aug. 25, 1994 interview with Boston’s gay newspaper Bay Windows: “The authorization of marriage on a same-sex basis falls under state jurisdiction.”
Gun-toting Romney called himself a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association in April 2007. (Actually that “lifetime” began in August 2006.)
Gun-controlling Romney declared in 1994: “I don’t line up with the NRA.”
Sportsman Romney said in 2007: “I’ve been a hunter pretty much all my life.” A spokesman clarified that Romney actually had hunted precisely twice: At age 15 and in 2006.
“Ronald Reagan is . . . my hero,” the Gipper-loving Romney said in 2005, as the Boston Globe’s Scot Lehigh noted on Jan. 19, 2007. “I believe that our party’s ascendancy began with Ronald Reagan’s brand of visionary and courageous leadership.”
“I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush,” Reagan-bashing Romney said in 1994, while running against the late senator Edward Moore Kennedy (D., Mass.). “I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”
Actually, Romney is doing Republicans a huge favor by disappointing them now, when they can deny him the nomination, rather than waiting until after being inaugurated, as both president Bushes so maddeningly did.
Daddy Bush spent eight years riding shotgun beside Ronald Reagan. Surely, two terms as the Gipper’s vice president prepared him to fortify Reagan’s victories. Wrong! Read my lips: George Herbert Walker Bush raised taxes, swelled spending, and wimpishly dissolved when challenged by a young governor of Arkansas making his maiden presidential bid.
Baby Bush “will be nothing like his dad,” his supporters promised. “He’s like Reagan’s grandson.” Wrong again! Tax cuts and the War on Terror aside, George Walker Bush spent America into a hole, nationalized companies like teenage girls buy shoes, and steered the GOP into a ditch from which only the Tea Party could rescue it.
Republicans should expose a potential nominee’s fatal flaws before, not after, the primaries.
For a change, Republicans should heed a top Democrat. Like the proverbial busted clock that is right twice daily, Senate majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada was correct Tuesday when he said of Willard Mitt Romney: “The front-runner in the Republican stakes now? Here’s a man who doesn’t know who he is.”
Who is Mitt Romney? A stink’n liberal - it’s that simple.
Who is Romney: Mitt is a liberal who knows he can’t win the Republican nomination on his liberal thinking SO pretends that he is a conservative for votes. There are other names for these sort of people, RINO and WHORE come to mind.
I was there. Ban Me Thout 1969. Never ran into Algore where I was and never heard of Romney at the time.
Romney is a loser.
Sadly, it's still anyone but Obama and I'll vote for him like I voted for McCain.
Holding my nose.
It wouldn’t be so bad if Romney was a RINO. But Romney is whoever he thinks he needs to be that day. That is the worst of all possibilities.
He’s an empty suit.
Romney may have his flaws, but the writer of this article is parsing words. It is not a good, or fair, analysis. I am a bit surprised. The Nationl Review usually does a better job.
Sadly I agree. I would vote for an ameba over barry. I WANT a conservative and will do everything I can in the primaries to make that happen.
He's Vidal Sassoon's and Clairol's Love Child.
A flip-flopping callow hack who will say anything to get elected, but would still be stomped by 0bama.
Who is Mittwitt? A liberal mormon seeking to be a “god-man” who I will never vote for.
Oh you mean MYTH ROMNEY
(hat tip MissMack)
Where is Buffalo?
Why is cheese?
When is it time to leave?
What is twelve?
How far is orange?
Can dogs whistle?
Some things are beyond explanation.
What is the sound of one hand clapping? “Swish swish”. How hard is that?
Yup!
Well, he ain’t the dude responsible for re-posting the same article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2739309/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.